Hi Justin: I have understood the following questions, thanks:
Thank you for your prompt reply, I understand. And there is one more question for help: - NOTICE is missing information from other Apache licensed NOTICE files. Information from these NOTICE files [5][6][7][10] will need to be added. We did it in the way of [6] [10]. What is the relationship between [5] [7] and [6] [10]? When do you use the former mode to declare, and when do you use the concise mode? Goson zhang <gosonzh...@apache.org> 于2021年1月28日周四 上午11:56写道： > Hi Justin: > > Thank you for your prompt reply, I understand. And there is one more > question for help: > > - NOTICE is missing information from other Apache licensed NOTICE files. > Information from these NOTICE files [5][6][7][10] will need to be added. > > We did it in the way of [6] [10]. What is the relationship between [5] [7] > and [6] [10]? When do you use the former mode to declare, and when do you > use the concise mode? > > Thanks! > > Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> 于2021年1月28日周四 上午11:46写道： > >> Hi, >> >> > 1. If the referenced file source has the original version statement, we >> should keep it as it is and cannot replace it with the Apache v2 statement? >> >> Correct. >> >> > 2. If the referenced file source does not have a version statement, but >> the project of the file has a version statement, do we copy the license >> statement of the project to the file header? >> >> I would just leave the file as it is. >> >> > 3. Do we still need to indicate which project the source of the >> document comes from? >> > such as[9]: >> > /** >> > * Utility for .ini configure file loading. >> > * Copied from <a href="https://github.com/killme2008/Metamorphosis < >> https://github.com/killme2008/Metamorphosis>">Metamorphosis Project</a> >> > */ >> >> It best to mentioner that in LICENSE, but I see no harm in adding that. >> >> Thanks, >> Justin > >
