Thanks for the clarity, David.
Given the clear "commit trail" for individual committers and the ICLAs I don't
see a problem there. I think the only question that may need a bit more
clarity is the relationship of Dremio to the contributions. I know my own
employer has boilerplate legal claims on any open source work I do using
company equipment or during "working hours" but there is also a process to
allow/approve contributions.
Can you elaborate on any corporate relationship to the contributions and if
there is a process for open source contributions, particularly if the
contributors used corporate computers or labor, and whether this is addressed
in the CCLA?
On 7/17/22, 8:15 PM, "David Li" <lidav...@apache.org> wrote:
Hello,
Sorry for some of the confusion here, I'll try to explain. (Apologies if
this does not get linked back up correctly to the thread - Pony Mail does not
let me login and the mailto: link generates a URL which is too long).
I did preemptively ask the contributors to add the Apache license
boilerplate before final submission, so apologies for the confusion there. The
original files as I recall either had the header or did not have any header.
There was a short discussion on the Arrow dev@ list at [1] where we decided
to go through the IP clearance process to make sure everything was clear, since
when the PR was first submitted, it had been developed for a long time outside
the community (with commits dating back to 2020, although the PR was submitted
in 2022).
I believe Abner submitted an ICLA. I will re-confirm with the authors (I
can't appear to view this information myself on the Apache side).
[1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/xytqttpov1d3q9mhd6nrlz7xkl7q5zjp
Hopefully this helps,
David
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
