Hi, The CC BY 4.0 is not compatible with the Apache license, so I would avoid it if you can. While the Apache license is intended for code, it’s OK to use for documentation as well.
Kind Regards, Justin > On 2 May 2024, at 1:25 pm, tison <wander4...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > IIUC, the Apache License 2.0 is mainly to license code and related stuff > that constructs the final software. > > However, projects may also create text content like documents. Is it > appropriate to use Apache License 2.0 for them (since quite a few terms may > not be applicable)? Or what licenses shall we use? > > For example, a website repo can contain both code and docs. In my personal > site, I wrote: > >> Code is licensed under Apache-2.0, words and images are licensed under CC > BY 4.0. > > But I don't know if we can write the same to a site repo of an ASF project. > > Best, > tison. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
