Thank you! Using Apache License 2.0 as the single license makes sense to me.
Best, tison. Shane Curcuru <a...@shanecurcuru.org> 于2024年5月2日周四 19:55写道： > (Moving general@incubator and dev@community to BCC since this is really > a legal question about ASF licensing) > > tison wrote on 5/1/24 11:25 PM: > > Hi, > > > > IIUC, the Apache License 2.0 is mainly to license code and related stuff > > that constructs the final software. > > > > However, projects may also create text content like documents. Is it > > appropriate to use Apache License 2.0 for them (since quite a few terms > > may not be applicable)? Or what licenses shall we use? > > The ASF uses the Apache-2.0 license for our projects' own content that > is put into any releases, immaterial of type of content: > > https://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-docs > > Using a single license reduces complexity, and makes it simpler for > users to understand the issues around re-using ASF products. > > -- > - Shane > Member > The Apache Software Foundation > >
