Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> on 12/15/01 2:20 PM, "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think allowing each project to define what is acceptable is the way it's
> > working now and it's probably best to leave it that way.
>
> +1
>
> I can see what Kevin is saying by establishing a 'baseline' though I think
> that getting agreement about what that baseline is will be more discussion
> than it is worth...I think it is easier to simply point at FooProject and say
> that BarProject is going to emulate FooProject...
Good point... I think the Turbine docs are a step towards this.
Having a column, line wrap would be nice though.
Kevin
--
Kevin A. Burton ( [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
Location - San Francisco, CA, Cell - 415.595.9965
Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED], Web - http://relativity.yi.org/
'We feel that there are real opportunities with evil, and that when evil is
integrated it into our next generation of Windows products consumers will
[Prince of Darkness] appreciate evil on their desktop,' said Microsoft Chairman
Bill Gates. 'Businesses haven't been able to fully realize their evil
potential. With evil integrated into Office 2001, corporations big and small
will begin to see enhanced evil productivity.'
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
