At 11:34 04.01.2002 -0500, you wrote: >Ted Husted wrote: >> >> What would also help, I think, would be if we published more of our >> statistics. I know Vincent was working on a download stats page once. >> I've also seen people post interesting statistics about the posts to the >> mailing lists. A snapshot of how many commits are being made and number >> of unique committers making them would also be interesting. And other >> things, I'm sure. >> >> Now, if I only had the faintest idea of how to automate something like >> this ... > >Stefano, I and others are working on this. > >http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-apache-general&m=100857962129228&w=2 >http://www.apache.org/~stefano/forrest/1.5/ > >- Sam Ruby > >P.S. Food for thought: wouldn't it be nice if we could somehow merge xml >and Jakarta? Then discussions as to where POI should go would be moot. >Gump doesn't care about these arbitrary distinctions, why should we?
+1 on the principle of merging Jakarta and XML. However, you realize there are technical considerations such as the look and fell of the merged web-site. More importantly, what would be the scope of the merged XML+Jakarta? How should we call the combined project? ApacheGrabBag? SourceForgeII? How about all the C++ projects in XML land? When do you think ApacheGrabBag/SourceForgeII and the httpd projects could be merged? Seriously, I think the idea is worth our consideration. Regards, Ceki -- Ceki Gülcü - http://qos.ch -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
