Ceki Gülcü wrote: > > IMHO, XML does not and will never have a community as long as two of > its most important projects directly compete with each other. The > success of one is related with the failure of the other. XML > Community? Won't happen in a million years. How the did Crimson > become an Apache project anyway?
Look closely, Xerces 2 is the designated successor to *both* Xerces 1 and Crimson. The developers *are* working together. I won't pretend that everything is 100% smooth sailing, but significant progress is being made. > The required majority for the adoption of proposals can be simple or > qualified. Even if the qualified majority is 3/4, this would be better > than the veto system we have today. Although a veto can be overridden > by a 3/4 majority, as far as I know, this has never happened in the > past. Today someone voting -1 means end of discussion. > > I dare anyone to -1 that. Regards, Ceki The rules you describe don't look familiar to me. The ones I am familiar with are: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html http://jakarta.apache.org/site/management.html - Sam Ruby -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
