Innovation is necessary. But duplication is also necessary for the purpose of adoption. The only way to beat Exchange is to look like Exchange. The innovation will then help, but only after the user thinks that it *is* Exchange.
Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 12:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ECS?? _TOP_ level project of Jakarta?? > > > on 1/29/02 11:54 AM, "lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 14:22, Scott Sanders wrote: > >> Yes. I have been thinking that Exchange needs an OSS competitor. > > > > Yes yes yes yes yes. > > Why would anyone want to create an OSS competitor of a piece of sh*t? > > Let's innovate, not duplicate. > > -jon > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:general-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
