On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 15:08, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > on 1/29/02 11:54 AM, "lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 14:22, Scott Sanders wrote: > >> Yes. I have been thinking that Exchange needs an OSS competitor. > > > > Yes yes yes yes yes. > > Why would anyone want to create an OSS competitor of a piece of sh*t? >
+ 1/2 I think achieving interoperability with the clients would be good. Basically a drop-inable replacement that is *better*. I like the calendar thing in excel et al...I'd never actually use it unless forced because I've got my palm (and yes I don't actually care about synchronizing it because I never use that info on my PC or if I do its less convenient to synch then type). My issue is the places I typically work if I could sell a drop in replacement for Exchange...heck yeah cause then I wouldn't be forced to use that spamming virus ridden security hole and would be able to pick my own email client instead of often being forced into one. -Andy > Let's innovate, not duplicate. > > -jon > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- www.superlinksoftware.com www.sourceforge.net/projects/poi - port of Excel format to java http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html - fix java generics! The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. -Ambassador Kosh -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
