On Sun, 20 Oct 2002 10:31, John McNally wrote: > It seems like a similar idea, or am I wrong? I liked the idea of spfc. > Though the change in perspective needed to think of a webapp in terms of > event driven components was considered too great a stretch, I guess. Is > such an approach gaining more acceptance, or have I missed the point of > Tapestry?
Component + Event driven web dev has got a lot more press recently. MS uses it. Sun is trying to develope a standard for it (see Java Faces which I believe Craig chairs) and there is quite a few other toolkits out there that do it and some even go the full way (swinglets or whatever it is called). -- Cheers, Peter Donald ------------------------------------ The two secrets to success: 1- Don't tell anyone everything. ------------------------------------ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
