I don't have a way to qualify this, but I'm very concerned about growing the community, and therefore I'm very careful not to be arbitrary. Everything is a discussion, and I prefer that person X be happy with the ultimate decision, preferably agreeing with it.
I've tried to before to spur more organization, but that didn't really get started. The problem is, developers are too happy, I think. The framework does mostly what they need, bugs fixes and improvements happen, so there hasn't been a need to get involved. A move to Jakarta will *force* a few people (and I know who they are) to step forward, since other wise, by the rules, nothing will actually happen. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 9:04 PM Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Tapestry joins Jakarta On Sun, 20 Oct 2002 02:06, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote: > "Benevolent dictatorship". Probably should have expanded on this. Without > a formal comittee or voting system, I've reserved the right to ultimately > decide what goes into the framework and what doesn't. Start changing now. I don't know how long it will be before you come to Apache but there is no harm and considerable benefit in moving to this model IMHO. It would also enhance your chances of making it into Apache. -- Cheers, Peter Donald -------------------------------------------------- Logic: The art of being wrong with confidence... -------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:general-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
