On Sun, 07 Dec 2003, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be very noisy, indeed.
Szre. > Here are some stats from October (from message counts displayed at > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com) > > struts tomcat commons > user 3115 2908 375 > dev 759 1131 2112 I guess you could remove half of struts user if we added a jakarta-friday list 8-) Seriously, combining the user lists is not desirable at all IMHO, as our users probably don't care too much for the projects they don't use. Let's look at the dev lists using nagoya's eyebrowse installation and looking at the number of mails in Nevember 2003: Alexandria 3 BCEL 12 BSF 8 Cactus 173 Commons 2061 Commons-HTTP-Client 379 ECS 0 Jetspeed 283 JMeter 276 Gump 292 (*) Log4J 146 Lucene 164 ORO 3 Pluto 112 POI 213 Regexp 21 Slide 724 Struts 431 Taglibs 35 Tapestry 110 Tomcat 982 Turbine 271 Turbine-JCS 10 Velocity 244 I think there are more lists than that. (*) using MARC as Gump is not listed in eyebrowse. OK, the total is 6953, more than three times the traffic of commons-dev. This is unless we'd really split the lists into separate lists for bug reports, commits and ideas (I'm not sure I'd like that idea). Can anybody with a better memory for commons than I have recap why the httpclient traffic list has been split off? Did the httpclient developers want a list of their own or have the developers for the other commons components been overwhelmed by httpclient traffic? Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
