On 20/01/2009, Petar Tahchiev <paranoiabla.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>  I think I found the problem, but since I cannot reproduce
>  this behaviour I am clueless if this will work.
>  I think the problem is here:
>
>  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-98

The issue relates to not finding a property - however the code already
does a separate check to see if the property has been retrieved OK, so
I don't think it applies here.

>  I changed the version of the Surefire plugin we use to the latest
>  one.
>
>  I have commited it. Anything else before I make the RC-3 and cast the vote?
>

Probably best if Henri could provide more info on the failure he saw,
which I think was different from mine.

I'm also intending to try a test on Unix.

I suggest waiting a bit.

>
>  Thanks again, Petar.
>
>  On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Petar Tahchiev <
>
> paranoiabla.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  > Hi Sebb,
>  >
>  > I removed the CDDL license and described the servlet-api as
>  > an Apache 2.0 licensed. I also added the Apache license headers.
>  > I also changed the version of AspectJ we are using.
>  >
>  > About the test failures that you mention I think they are different
>  > from what Henry is getting. Anyways I am unable to reproduce them :-(
>  >
>  > What should I do? Do I need to make a RC-3 and call the vote on it?
>  >
>  > Thanks for the tips guys.
>  >
>  >
>  > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:42 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  >
>  >> On 20/01/2009, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  >> > On 20/01/2009, Petar Tahchiev <paranoiabla.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  >> >  > Hi all,
>  >> >  >
>  >> >  >  maybe I am too impatient, but has anybody tried the artifacts?
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> > 1 minor problem - the .asc files should be detached ascii signatures,
>  >> >  not signed archives.
>  >> >  No need to recreate the RC, just recreate the .asc files.
>  >> >
>  >> >  We don't normally provide binary .sig files - they can be deleted.
>  >> >
>  >> >  I'm still looking at other aspects of the RC.
>  >> >
>  >>
>  >> The servlet-api-2.4.jar file is an Apache version, as Henri already
>  >> mentioned.
>  >> The cddl licence should be deleted, and the README updated.
>  >>
>  >> Like Henri, I also get test failures:
>  >>
>  >> [surefire] Tests run: 5, Failures: 3, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.25
>  >> sec <<<<<<<< FAILURE !!
>  >> [surefire] Running
>  >> org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.deployment.webapp.TestWarArchive
>  >> [surefire] Tests run: 3, Failures: 3, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.031
>  >> sec <<<<<<<< FAILURE !!
>  >> [surefire] Running
>  >> org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.deployment.webapp.TestWebXml
>  >> [surefire] Tests run: 54, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 2.359 sec
>  >> [surefire] Running
>  >> org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.deployment.webapp.TestWebXmlVersion
>  >> [surefire] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.093 sec
>  >> [surefire] Running org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.TestCactifyEarTask
>  >> [surefire] Tests run: 3, Failures: 3, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.031
>  >> sec <<<<<<<< FAILURE !!
>  >> [surefire] Running org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.TestCactifyWarTask
>  >> [surefire] Tests run: 21, Failures: 21, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.281
>  >> sec <<<<<<<< FAILURE !!
>  >> [surefire] Running org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.TestCactusTask
>  >> [surefire] Tests run: 7, Failures: 7, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.078
>  >> sec <<<<<<<< FAILURE !!
>  >> [surefire] Running org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.TestCactusTestTask
>  >> [surefire] Tests run: 7, Failures: 7, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.094
>  >> sec <<<<<<<< FAILURE !!
>  >> [surefire] Running
>  >> org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.TestRunServerTestsTask
>  >> [surefire] Tests run: 6, Failures: 6, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.078
>  >> sec <<<<<<<< FAILURE !!
>  >>
>  >> I ran "mvn test", which failed when it could not find the cactus jars.
>  >> It would be better if this worked without needing to do "mvn install"
>  >> first.
>  >>
>  >> I then ran "mvn install" and got the errors shown above.
>  >>
>  >> It looks like these are all caused by
>  >>
>  >> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: The system property
>  >> 'testinput.dir' must point to an existing directory
>  >>        at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
>  >>        at junit.framework.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:20)
>  >>        at
>  >> 
> org.apache.cactus.integration.ant.AntTestCase.getBuildFile(AntTestCase.java:370)
>  >>
>  >> This is a bit odd, as the directory appears to be there.
>  >>
>  >> The assert() message ought to quote the directory name it is looking for.
>  >> [I'll update SVN trunk.]
>  >>
>  >> Even odder, the problem does not occur when I reran the test.
>  >> I've tried several times to recreate the error, but it only happened once.
>  >>
>  >> ==
>  >>
>  >> There are various jetty files under
>  >>
>  >> samples/jetty/src
>  >>
>  >> which don't have AL headers. Are these Jetty sources?
>  >> If so, then the source archive really needs to include the relevant
>  >> license.
>  >> If the samples were generated under the ASF, then they need the AL
>  >> headers.
>  >>
>  >> There seem to be some oddities in the main pom.xml:
>  >>
>  >>        <dependencies>
>  >>                <dependency>
>  >>                        <groupId>aspectj</groupId>
>  >>                        <artifactId>aspectjrt</artifactId>
>  >>                        <version>1.5.3</version>
>  >>                </dependency>
>  >>
>  >> specifies version 1.5.3, whereas
>  >>
>  >>        <dependencyManagement>
>  >>                <dependencies>
>  >> ...
>  >>                        <dependency>
>  >>                                <groupId>aspectj</groupId>
>  >>                                <artifactId>aspectjrt</artifactId>
>  >>                                <version>1.2.1</version>
>  >>                        </dependency>
>  >>
>  >> specifies version 1.2.1 - I would have expected the two to be the same?
>  >>
>  >> ==
>  >>
>  >> There are several maven.xml and project.xml files in the directory
>  >> tree - are these still current?
>  >>
>  >> >  >
>  >> >  >  What is your opinion expressed by any of the three numbers :-).
>  >> >  >
>  >> >  >
>  >> >  >  On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Petar Tahchiev <
>  >> >  >  paranoiabla.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  >> >  >
>  >> >  >  > Hi guys,
>  >> >  >  >
>  >> >  >  > here comes the second attempt for
>  >> >  >  > releasing cactus-1.8.1.
>  >> >  >  >
>  >> >  >  > The artifacts, hashes and signatures are here:
>  >> >  >
>  >> >  > > 
> http://people.apache.org/~ptahchiev/1.8.1-rc2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eptahchiev/1.8.1-rc2/>
>  >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eptahchiev/1.8.1-rc2/>
>  >> >  > >
>  >> >  >  > The tagged code-base is here:
>  >> >  >  > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/cactus/tags/1.8.1-rc2/
>  >> >  >  >
>  >> >  >  > I think it is OK this time.
>  >> >  >  >
>  >> >  >  > Here is my +1
>  >> >  >  >
>  >> >  >  >
>  >> >  >  > Please vote.
>  >> >  >  >
>  >> >  >  > Thanks.
>  >> >  >  >
>  >> >  >  > --
>  >> >  >  > Regards, Petar!
>  >> >  >  > Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>  >> >  >  >
>  >> >  >  > EOOXML objections
>  >> >  >  > http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections
>  >> >  >  >
>  >> >  >  > Public PGP Key at:
>  >> >  >  >
>  >> http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9
>  >> >  >  > Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B  4210 1A15 B53B 7615
>  >> 00F9
>  >> >  >  >
>  >> >  >
>  >> >  >
>  >> >  >
>  >> >  >  --
>  >> >  >  Regards, Petar!
>  >> >  >  Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>  >> >  >
>  >> >  >  EOOXML objections
>  >> >  >  http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections
>  >> >  >
>  >> >  >  Public PGP Key at:
>  >> >  >
>  >> http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9
>  >> >  >  Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B  4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9
>  >> >  >
>  >> >
>  >>
>  >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
>  >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > Regards, Petar!
>  > Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>  >
>  > EOOXML objections
>  > http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections
>  >
>  > Public PGP Key at:
>  > http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9
>  > Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B  4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9
>  >
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards, Petar!
>  Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>
>  EOOXML objections
>  http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections
>
>  Public PGP Key at:
>  http://keyserver.linux.it/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1A15B53B761500F9
>  Key Fingerprint: AA16 8004 AADD 9C76 EF5B  4210 1A15 B53B 7615 00F9
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org

Reply via email to