> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rahul Akolkar [mailto:rahul.akol...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 14:44
> To: Jakarta General List
> Cc: bcel-...@jakarta.apache.org; bsf-...@jakarta.apache.org; cactus-
> d...@jakarta.apache.org; ecs-...@jakarta.apache.org; jcs-
> d...@jakarta.apache.org; jmeter-...@jakarta.apache.org; oro-
> d...@jakarta.apache.org; regexp-...@jakarta.apache.org; slide-
> d...@jakarta.apache.org; Jakarta Project Management Committee List
> Subject: [PROPOSAL] One development list
> 
> [Out of necessity, this is heavily cross-posted. Suggestion is to send
> any replies to the gene...@jakarta list only to keep any discussion in
> one place.]
> 
> We currently have 8 active development lists at Jakarta, each devoted
> to a subproject. I've been subscribed to all for a while and based on
> my observations and the overall benefits of doing so, I think its time
> to consolidate them into a single development list at Jakarta.
> 
> Motivations (not in any order):
>  * Flattens and simplifies oversight - Not much else to be said on
> that.
>  * Communication - Subprojects can often have various touch points.
> So, Rony's surprise today at the BSF taglib being retired is one
> example. Lets have all dev discussions on one list.
>  * Cross-pollination - Most subprojects are at the point where it
> certainly wouldn't hurt to have the active folks from all of Jakarta
> around for dev discussions, votes etc.
>  * Manageable overhead - More on this later, but we have a number of
> usual suspects showing up on many of the dev lists, they'd barely
> notice a difference. Others can manage, IMO/hopefully.
> 
> Operationally:
>  * The combined list traffic will obviously be more than any one of
> the separate lists. However, development tends to be in spurts on
> these lists and the probabilistic chances of more than a couple of
> subproject spurts happening at the same time seems quite low. Overall,
> combined traffic is not at all overpowering IMO.
>  * The proposal will include closing current dev lists and adding all
> subscribers to the one new dev list. We'll post a heads up on these
> lists before that. Throw in site-cvs@ as well for good measure.
>  * We could repurpose general@ as the one dev list, but OTOH, seems
> worthwhile to maintain the dev / general separation.
>  * No changes proposed to the user lists.
> 

+1 to merging into one dev list.

> Thoughts?
> 
> Lets say a little over a week (10 days, which should give us two
> weekends) for initial feedback and opinions please.
> 
> -Rahul
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org

Reply via email to