Hi Eric,
Thanks. The main reason I'd say is RFC compatibility. I believe it
will help to make James Protocols more popular if it will comply with
RFCs.
In my particular case, we are adding POP3 support to ElasticInbox
through James Protocols and our UID is Base64 encoded UUID.
Many thanks,
Rustam.
On Sat Oct 20 18:07:44 2012, Eric Charles wrote:
Hi Rustam,
I will provide feedback on the JIRA for Monday.
I remember you were using String instead of int for uid. Any
particular reason?
(better use James Developers List <server-...@james.apache.org>
mailing list for further communication, see
http://james.apache.org/mail.html)
Thx, Eric
On 20/10/2012 13:50, Rustam Aliyev wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask. I submitted patch for
POP3
a week ago - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTOCOLS-98
Could someone provide any feedback please?
Many thanks,
Rustam.
