Hi Faisal,

 

Sometime ago, I had to get some info on FTP so I ended up reading part of the RFC on FTP,

I could be wrong, but I do remember reading that FTP creates sockets on different ports (other than 21)

behind the scenes to transfer the files, it could be the overhead of creating/deleting each socket for each file
as we know FTP utilizes TCP which means handshaking overhead.

 

Faisal I think you can change the transfer type between two options, Passive FTP or sth…

Add on top of that the IO time like my fellow friends pointed out, and I guess we

Have a good explanation don’t you think!..

 

Just my $0.02.. and I could be way to wrong :D

 

Fadi .K


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al-Faisal
Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2006 12:03 PM
To: Jordan Linux User Group Mailing list
Subject: [JoLUG-General] FTP Question

 

Hey guys,
I have been using FTP a lot lately to upload/download files from a web server, and i have noticed that when you download or upload one large file, it takes less time (far less time) than a group of smaller files with the same total size.

Since i am not much of an expert in networking, I just started wondering as to why that happens? is that normal? does perhaps initializing the streams for every file consume that much time?

I tried it using a Java applet provided by the web hosting provider, and the FTP command on the shell.

Just a curious mind wondering, thanks in advance.
--
Al-Faisal El-Dajani
Tel: +962-7-88 719 685
P.O Box: 140056
11814 Amman, Jordan

May the source be with you

_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.jolug.org/mailman/listinfo/general_jolug.org

Reply via email to