It seems clear what I disagree with.
----- Original Message ----- From: Joey K Tuttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Saturday, June 24, 2006 5:53 pm Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] significant digits > Better to fix it? Seems to me the following should produce > the same results ... > > '0' 8!:2 ] 365365365365365365x^2 > 133491850208566945040100911382265856 > 0": 365365365365365365^2 > 133491850208566926593356837672714240 > > You disagree with that? > > > At 17:10 -0700 2006/06/24, R&S HUI wrote: > > > IMHO, it would be a good idea to include a comment ... > > > >I disagree. > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: Joey K Tuttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >> IMHO, it would be a good idea to include a comment in the 8!: > >> documentation page that expands on the description - "y is > >> usually an array of real numbers." to the effect that extended > > > integers may cause erratic results. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
