While looking for my message in the jforum email
archive that had not shown up in my email (this gmail
feature has finally caught up with me too, it seems) I
discovered that several messaages have been corrupted as
stated in the Subject. But the corruption is not predictable
yet, to me. For example in the messages excerpted below,
only the rightmost 'a' is corrupted, but it may be that the
other occurrences were not corrupted because of their
closest neighboring characters being parens and periods, for
example.
At least one of the examples below is NOT corrupted
in my own email copy, so I wonder if this is a (new) feature
of the archiving system that could be corrected?
********below is taken from printout of the archive's search*******
[Jprogramming] What a drag [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 13 Dec 2006
A small improvement is achieved assuming that if the
first character is a space, the whole row is spaces.
dragR =: {~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] >./\@:* ] -. at e. 1{.0{.]
dragRb =: {~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] >./\@:* ' '~:(({.)"1)
[Jprogramming] What a drag [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 13 Dec 2006
It seems that important role in performace plays test for
fill element.
So far I've seen 3:
ft1=:(+./"1@:~:&' ')
ft2=:(-. at e. 1{.0{.])
[Jprogramming] What a drag [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 12 Dec 2006
here is another take:
drag=:#~ (#^:_1 [: }:@(-~ 1&|.) [: I. ,&1)@(-. at -:"1 [: {. 0 {. ])
this one is based on #^:_1/# rather than {, which might be a
tad faster.
********end of printout of the archive's search***********
(B=) <----------my "sig"
Brian Schott
Atlanta, GA, USA
schott DOT bee are eye eh en AT gee em ae eye el DOT com
http://schott.selfip.net/~brian/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
