No! ''$6 gives 6
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terrence Brannon Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2007 09:19 To: General forum Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] 1 2 3 , 0$6 versus 1 2 3 , 6 - reshaping atomic argument to shape of items of the other Raul Miller wrote: > On Dec 25, 2007 7:06 AM, Terrence Brannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> First let's go thru 1 2 3 , 0 $ 6 >> >> 1. Reshaping an atomic argument to the shape of the items of the other, >> >> So 1 2 3 is not atomic. >> > > 1 2 3 is not atomic but the items of 1 2 3 are atomic. > > Yes, but my problem remains... http://jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/d320.htm 1. Reshaping an atomic argument to the shape of the items of the other so for 1 2 3 , 6 6 is an atomic argument and must be shaped to the shape of the ITEMS of 1 2 3 The shape of the ITEMS of 1 2 3 is '' So 6 must be reshaped to '' which (I suppose) makes it '' and thus you now have 1 2 3 , '' which would be 1 2 3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
