Moni Shoua wrote: >> I guess I can believe things don't get worse but I still don't know how >> this makes things better. With the current code the request is lost >> because it goes to the wrong SM; with the new code the request is failed >> by the SA layer. So in both cases the consumer just has to try again. >> >> So is there some practical benefit we see by adding this code? >> >> - R. >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> To unsubscribe, please visit >> http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general >> > > In general I see the benefit in faster detection of wrong SM ah. Before the > patch consumers > need to wait for a timeout before the detection and after the patch it > happens immediately > on return from the function. This improves the performance of an SM failover > scenario. > > Some applications may get the benefit above only they handle new return > code (EAGAIN) specifically > but this patch opens the door for such improvement. > > thanks > > MoniS > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general > > To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general >
Hi Roland, Can we please go on with this patch? We would like to see it in the next kernel. thanks MoniS _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
