Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > OK. Here is an example that was viewed in our tests.
>  > One IPoIB host (client) sends a stream of multicast packets to another 
> IPoIB host (server).
>  > SM takeover event takes place during traffic and as a result multicast 
> info is flushed
>  > and there is a need to rejoin by hosts. Without the patch there is a 
> chance (which according to our experience
>  > is a very big chance) that the request to rejoin will be to the old  SM 
> and only after a retry join completes successfully.
>  > This takes too long and the patch solves it.
> 
> OK, that is fairly convincing (and it would be nice to include when
> sending the original patch).
> 
> Please resend a version that fixes the races in the patch and we can
> probably add this for 2.6.27.
> 
>  - R.
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
> 
> To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
> 
Thanks. I will resend this patch in a series of 2 (in a different thread)
The other patch in the series is related to the one above but was sent by me 
earlier
in a different thread without justification. 

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to