Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> Hi Eli,
> 
> On 14:58 Tue 23 Dec     , Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) wrote:
>>  Add support for PortXmitWait counter
>>  Show PortCounters::PortXmitWait when this capability is supported by the 
>> firmware.
>>  If not supported show this counter as 0.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eli Dorfman <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  infiniband-diags/src/perfquery.c  |   10 +++++++++-
>>  libibmad/include/infiniband/mad.h |    1 +
>>  libibmad/src/fields.c             |    1 +
>>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/infiniband-diags/src/perfquery.c 
>> b/infiniband-diags/src/perfquery.c
>> index 7a53e92..4166fff 100644
>> --- a/infiniband-diags/src/perfquery.c
>> +++ b/infiniband-diags/src/perfquery.c
>> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct perf_count {
>>      uint32_t rcvdata;
>>      uint32_t xmtpkts;
>>      uint32_t rcvpkts;
>> +    uint32_t xmtwait;
>>  };
>>  
>>  struct perf_count_ext {
>> @@ -210,6 +211,8 @@ static void aggregate_perfcounters(void)
>>      aggregate_32bit(&perf_count.xmtpkts, val);
>>          mad_decode_field(pc, IB_PC_RCV_PKTS_F, &val);
>>      aggregate_32bit(&perf_count.rcvpkts, val);
>> +        mad_decode_field(pc, IB_PC_XMT_WAIT_F, &val);
>> +    aggregate_32bit(&perf_count.xmtwait, val);
>>  }
> 
> Should XMT_WAIT support be added to output_aggregate_perfcounters(),
> reset and other places too?

reset is not supported by the firmware (at the moment).
need to add xmitwait to output_aggregate_perfcounters() as well.

> 
>>  
>>  static void output_aggregate_perfcounters(ib_portid_t *portid)
>> @@ -299,9 +302,14 @@ static void dump_perfcounters(int extended, int 
>> timeout, uint16_t cap_mask, ib_p
>>      if (extended != 1) {
>>              if (!port_performance_query(pc, portid, port, timeout))
>>                      IBERROR("perfquery");
>> +            if (!(cap_mask & 0x1000)) {
>> +                    /* if PortCounters:PortXmitWait not suppported clear 
>> this counter */
>> +                    perf_count.xmtwait = 0;
>> +                    mad_encode_field(pc, IB_PC_XMT_WAIT_F, 
>> &perf_count.xmtwait);
>> +            }
>>              if (aggregate)
>>                      aggregate_perfcounters();
>> -            else
>> +            else 
>>                      mad_dump_perfcounters(buf, sizeof buf, pc, sizeof pc);
>>      } else {
>>              if (!(cap_mask & 0x200)) /* 1.2 errata: bit 9 is extended 
>> counter support */
>> diff --git a/libibmad/include/infiniband/mad.h 
>> b/libibmad/include/infiniband/mad.h
>> index c2ad148..6c313f9 100644
>> --- a/libibmad/include/infiniband/mad.h
>> +++ b/libibmad/include/infiniband/mad.h
>> @@ -413,6 +413,7 @@ enum MAD_FIELDS {
>>      IB_PC_RCV_BYTES_F,
>>      IB_PC_XMT_PKTS_F,
>>      IB_PC_RCV_PKTS_F,
>> +    IB_PC_XMT_WAIT_F,
>>      IB_PC_LAST_F,
>>  
>>      /*
> 
> Basically I'm fine to have two separate patches - one to support
> XMT_WAIT in libibmad and another one for perfquery, this is a minor
> although.

it is all part of the same change.

> 
> Sasha
> 
>> diff --git a/libibmad/src/fields.c b/libibmad/src/fields.c
>> index 6942e85..116e432 100644
>> --- a/libibmad/src/fields.c
>> +++ b/libibmad/src/fields.c
>> @@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ ib_field_t ib_mad_f [] = {
>>      [IB_PC_RCV_BYTES_F]             {224, 32, "RcvData", mad_dump_uint},
>>      [IB_PC_XMT_PKTS_F]              {256, 32, "XmtPkts", mad_dump_uint},
>>      [IB_PC_RCV_PKTS_F]              {288, 32, "RcvPkts", mad_dump_uint},
>> +    [IB_PC_XMT_WAIT_F]              {320, 32, "XmtWait", mad_dump_uint},
>>  
>>      /*
>>       * SMInfo
>> -- 
>> 1.5.5
>>

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general

Reply via email to