On 13:41 Wed 04 Feb , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > Sasha, > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Hal, > > > > On 07:57 Tue 03 Feb , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >> > >> Trivial description change to osm_node_get_num_physp. > > > > It makes some troubles for me to comment over attachments... :( > > > > In this comment line: > > > > +* Returns the number of physical ports (+1) for this node. > > > > "(+1)" will not be true for switch nodes. > > Are you sure about that ? It's not what I see regardless of whether > base or enhanced SP0.
For switch it will be an actual number of allocated physical ports (struct osm_physp) - port 0 olus number of external ports. For non switch nodes entry '0' is not used. Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
