On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Sasha Khapyorsky <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15:03 Wed 04 Feb , Hal Rosenstock wrote: >> > >> > For switch it will be an actual number of allocated physical ports >> > (struct osm_physp) - port 0 olus number of external ports. For non >> > switch nodes entry '0' is not used. >> >> Right. In my terms, physical is another name for an external port and >> port 0 is not a physical (external) port so I think we're quibbling >> about words. What do you think it should say ? > > I don't really have a good opinion :(. Maybe something like: > > * Returns the number of osm_physp ports allocated for this for node > * (for switches it is number of external physical ports plus port > * 0 and number of physical ports + 1 for non-switch nodes).
Fine with me. Let me know if you want a patch for this. -- Hal > It is long... :( > > Sasha > _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
