Hi Eli, [adding ofw list...]
On 10:13 Mon 09 Mar , Eli Dorfman (Voltaire) wrote: > > Can we revert commit 2dbb8b95d9dc27423a6fdb85d88ef385ecee0005 ? > "remove c99 definitions within the ib_mad_f structure > to enable better portability with WinOF." I suppose that just reverting will break WinOF. The whole discussion started somewhere at: http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2008-December/055902.html > Using the definitions makes the code clearer and safer to maintain. I agree and would prefer to have C99 "on" in our tree - it is really useful. > Aren't there better alternative, such as using gcc for example? WinOF Guys! This is one more call to find a way to coexist with C99. Sasha _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
