On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:34:54 +0200 "Eli Dorfman (Voltaire)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sean Hefty wrote: > > this knowingly breaks the windows build... > > > So what do you suggest? > Ira replied that he has no problems with it. I am sorry if I was unclear but I was speaking in _favor_ of having Windows compatibility. I meant I have no problem maintaining windows compatibility but was mentioning the fact that I don't have a way to test this (and I am sure Sean knows that many other developers here are in the same situation). Therefore, I was hoping that I would be forgiven if I accidentally broke the build. I too am a bit frustrated by this patch. Mainly because Sasha just accepted the exact opposite patch about a month ago! Ira For reference the conversation was: <snip> > On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:15:17 -0700 > "Sean Hefty" <[email protected]> wrote: <snip> > > > > This is getting old and frustrating. Do the OFA IB vendors not want to > > support > > Windows based systems connected to their hardware? > > > I have no problem with it but I don't have a Windows machine to test on. So this will make the effort harder on your part Sean, sorry. Ira -- Ira Weiny Math Programer/Computer Scientist Larence Livermore National Lab [email protected] _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit http://openib.org/mailman/listinfo/openib-general
