Last time I read RFC66, both I and Alin thought it was messy (albeit needed) and Alin was tasked with the challenge of do the best possible he could dream up and created Pax Web as an implementation of what the spec should encompass. Unless a lot of changes has happened to RFC66, I think it shouldn't be implemented but rewritten (which I am not allowed to do) to something more useful, along the lines of what Pax Web represents...
-- Niclas On Sep 28, 2009 9:14 PM, "Guillaume Nodet" <[email protected]> wrote: Not necesseraly overlap, it may be cooperation. The first thing that comes to my mind is that Aries will have to provide in some way an implementation of RFC 66, Web Applications. I'm not sure what's the status of pax-web is wrt this RFC, but it's an area where we can cooperate. On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 15:00, Leen Toelen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > this is something to k... > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
