Bamboo can run the actual builds on separate "agents" and those I think by now can even just run in the cloud. It does mean adding more hardware (and cost) though. Sounds a bit silly to need so much memory for CI software which is basically cron on steriods anyway. ;)
Greetings, Marcel On 29 Oct 2010, at 12:14 , Peter Neubauer wrote: > Mmh, > we have only 1G memory on the server. It seems that Bamboo needs most > of that to start, and then does not have memory free to run build > jobs. I am thinking of cleaning out a lot of jobs. If that doesn't > help to bring things back to normal, maybe we should either get a > bigger server (not my preference), switch to Hudson, or move the > interesting builds from ci.ops4j.org to other servers and decomission > this one. > > Has anyone access to another build server? > > Cheers, > > /peter neubauer > > GTalk: neubauer.peter > Skype peter.neubauer > Phone +46 704 106975 > LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer > Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer > > http://www.neo4j.org - Your high performance graph database. > http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party. > > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Peter Neubauer > <peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com> wrote: >> Looked into it yesterday. We are having too little memory on the machine, >> will reconfigure today evening. >> >> /peter - From my cellphone, please excuse typos and brevity... >> >> On Oct 25, 2010 4:58 AM, "Andreas Pieber" <anpie...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hey, >>> >>> http://ci.ops4j.org/ is down. Is the CI server on any other location or >>> really >>> down? >>> >>> kind regards, >>> andreas >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > general@lists.ops4j.org > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > _______________________________________________ general mailing list general@lists.ops4j.org http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
