Yeah,
I think so too. That is why I am a bit tired of Bamboo :)

Cheers,

/peter neubauer

GTalk:      neubauer.peter
Skype       peter.neubauer
Phone       +46 704 106975
LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer

http://www.neo4j.org               - Your high performance graph database.
http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.



On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Marcel Offermans
<marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl> wrote:
> Bamboo can run the actual builds on separate "agents" and those I think by 
> now can even just run in the cloud. It does mean adding more hardware (and 
> cost) though. Sounds a bit silly to need so much memory for CI software which 
> is basically cron on steriods anyway. ;)
>
> Greetings, Marcel
>
> On 29 Oct 2010, at 12:14 , Peter Neubauer wrote:
>
>> Mmh,
>> we have only 1G memory on the server. It seems that Bamboo needs most
>> of that to start, and then does not have memory free to run build
>> jobs. I am thinking of cleaning out a lot of jobs. If that doesn't
>> help to bring things back to normal, maybe we should either get a
>> bigger server (not my preference), switch to Hudson, or move the
>> interesting builds from ci.ops4j.org to other servers and decomission
>> this one.
>>
>> Has anyone access to another build server?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> /peter neubauer
>>
>> GTalk:      neubauer.peter
>> Skype       peter.neubauer
>> Phone       +46 704 106975
>> LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
>> Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
>>
>> http://www.neo4j.org               - Your high performance graph database.
>> http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Peter Neubauer
>> <peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com> wrote:
>>> Looked into it yesterday. We are having too little memory on the machine,
>>> will reconfigure today evening.
>>>
>>> /peter - From my cellphone, please excuse typos and brevity...
>>>
>>> On Oct 25, 2010 4:58 AM, "Andreas Pieber" <anpie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hey,
>>>>
>>>> http://ci.ops4j.org/ is down. Is the CI server on any other location or
>>>> really
>>>> down?
>>>>
>>>> kind regards,
>>>> andreas
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> general mailing list
>> general@lists.ops4j.org
>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>
>
>

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to