I am ok with both of these solutions, slightly leaning to 1. since I assume that people in Neo are too busy to bother with less urgent matters, and assuming that Neo won't let half a dozen or more external individuals in on their machines.
Cheers Niclas On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:40 AM, Peter Neubauer <[email protected]> wrote: > Guys, > it seems that the new servers come with 4GB RAM at half the cost of > the current machine for running Hudson (which has 1GB RAM). > > Now, I cannot "downgrade" that server, so we would have to > decommission that server and get a new, cheaper one. There are two > possibilities. > > 1. Get that cheaper server for OPS4J and let Neo Technology pay the > monthly cost. In case Neo Technology cannot take this forever (we are > VC backed and risky :) we can always proceed to alternative 2. > > 2. Ask Neo Technology (or someone else) to host the builds we want on > one of their build machines, in our case at > http://buildbox.neo4j.org/hudson/ > > Does anyone have an idea how many build plans we are talking about? In > any case, I would like to decommission the build server and get going > with a fresh setup. What do you think? Co-hosting or own server? > > Cheers, > > /peter neubauer > > GTalk: neubauer.peter > Skype peter.neubauer > Phone +46 704 106975 > LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer > Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer > > http://www.neo4j.org - Your high performance graph database. > http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party. > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
