I'll try to find a good way to solve the problem and keep 1.4 if possible. On Friday, January 21, 2011, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> wrote: > Last i've heard is that it was about to maximize compatibility with even non > desktop JVMs which sometimes sit on 1.4 or below.Not sure if this still is > true. > > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > The AppenderTracker seems to have some potential concurrency problems > around the map of appenders stored in a HashMap but accessed > concurrently by the service tracker and the appender wrapper each time > a statement is logged. > I'd like to fix this issue in an efficient way, meaning i don't want > to synchronize all access to the map and use a ConcurrentHashMap. > Is there a problem raising the Pax-Logging requirements to JDK 1.5 ? > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > -- > Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com > >
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
