No problem :) I let this thread opened fur further discussions till sunday/monday and then I'll cut the release
kind regards, andreas On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 10:45:23AM +0000, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > On 4 February 2011 04:04, Andreas Pieber <[1][email protected]> wrote: > > It seams that there have been some bug-fixes to pax-construct by > now. I think we > should draw another release of pax-construct; maybe a bugfix release > (or a > minor)? WDYT? If noone feels responsible for doing this I can do > this on sunday. > > I don't have time at the moment, so if you don't mind doing the release > that would be great :) > > kind regards, > andreas > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [2][email protected] > [3]http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > -- > Cheers, Stuart > > References > > 1. mailto:[email protected] > 2. mailto:[email protected] > 3. http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
pgpktbkpQBHpA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
