re: pax-construct - One of many "adjustments" I made on my end was to replace the maven .classpath code with the much more straightforward and workable m2eclipse classpath container stuff.
Is there a large contingent of people who use maven and eclipse and do not use m2eclipse? If not, this would be something I would suggest. On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: > No problem :) > > I let this thread opened fur further discussions till sunday/monday and > then > I'll cut the release > > kind regards, > andreas > > On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 10:45:23AM +0000, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > > On 4 February 2011 04:04, Andreas Pieber <[1][email protected]> > wrote: > > > > It seams that there have been some bug-fixes to pax-construct by > > now. I think we > > should draw another release of pax-construct; maybe a bugfix release > > (or a > > minor)? WDYT? If noone feels responsible for doing this I can do > > this on sunday. > > > > I don't have time at the moment, so if you don't mind doing the > release > > that would be great :) > > > > kind regards, > > andreas > > _______________________________________________ > > general mailing list > > [2][email protected] > > [3]http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > -- > > Cheers, Stuart > > > > References > > > > 1. mailto:[email protected] > > 2. mailto:[email protected] > > 3. http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > _______________________________________________ > > general mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
