Remember FrameworkFactory is OSGi Core (4.2) API, so that does not just benefit Pax Exam but .. practically anyone. But i don't really know what makes Karaf special yet. So far i though of Karaf always as: set of launchers & provisioning infrastructure.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: > @Toni: Mhm I think this should be possible. > @Karaf-Guys: How do you feel about implementing the FrameworkFactory > for Karaf and making Karaf itself an OSGi-Framework for pax-exam2? I > think a simple alternative solution could be to provide an > karaf-kick-starter which actually implements FrameworkFactory but > downloads the latest apache-karaf.zip/tar.gz, unpacks it and > kickstarts it? WDYT? > > Kind regards, > Andreas > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > I want to look at Karaf because for the Exam2 release we need to > balance > >> > between dropped features from exam1 and real bugs. > >> > There are some things that have been dropped on purpose: > >> > - like the ability to wire @Configurations to @Test methods via a > >> > pattern > >> > matching. This may be useful for some cases.. but i haven't seen it in > >> > use > >> > anywhere. > >> > Some stuff i hope can wait until 2.1: > >> > - maven plugin -> i don't really like it in Exam2 because it limits > you > >> > to > >> > only the PaxRunner container (now,you have more;) But i think people > use > >> > it. > >> > >> BTW, maybe it would be possible to use karaf itself as testcontainer > >> instead of e.g. felix or equinox? > >> > > Well thats a really good idea! > > The simpliest way would be if Karaf identifies itself as a OSGi Container > > (provides a FrameworkFactory). Then we can do it without a code change. > > Otherwise i have to look into what Karaf actually makes "Karaf". > > > >> > >> >> > Toni > >> >> > -> deutsch ? ;) > >> >> hä? ;) > >> > At some point i thought you are also german speaking.. > >> > >> Was my Denglish that obvious? ;) I'm from Austria, so yes Deutsch :) > >> > >> >> > >> >> Kind regards, > >> >> Andreas > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > Yes, i actually just started yesterday with build problems. > >> >> > Will push changes to https://github.com/tonit/karafonexam2 when > >> >> > things > >> >> > come > >> >> > up. > >> >> > Actually i was hoping for a not that long running build in order to > >> >> > just > >> >> > focus on the IT projects. > >> >> > ttyl, thanks! > >> >> > Toni > >> >> > -> deutsch ? ;) > >> >> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Andreas Pieber < > [email protected]> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Hey Toni, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> It would be much easier for me if you could push what you already > >> >> >> have > >> >> >> changed at Karaf to e.g. github and I can start from there? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Kind regards, > >> >> >> Andreas > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Toni Menzel < > [email protected]> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > yep. But technically that should be optional. But base will be > >> >> >> > released, > >> >> >> > too. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Andreas Pieber > >> >> >> > <[email protected]> > >> >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> BTW, I've just seen that you also have to release the base > >> >> >> >> packages > >> >> >> >> in > >> >> >> >> order to get out pax-runner-1.7 :) > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Kind regards, > >> >> >> >> Andreas > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Toni Menzel > >> >> >> >> <[email protected]> > >> >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > Hi Guys, > >> >> >> >> > i need to make a couple of releases in order to kick out a RC > >> >> >> >> > for > >> >> >> >> > Pax > >> >> >> >> > Exam > >> >> >> >> > 2.0 > >> >> >> >> > The only direct dependency is Pax URL 1.2.6 and Pax Runner > 1.7 > >> >> >> >> > (because > >> >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> >> > the new Aether stuff). > >> >> >> >> > So, those are the ones that will get a release, perhaps > already > >> >> >> >> > today, > >> >> >> >> > but > >> >> >> >> > possibly tomorrow. > >> >> >> >> > Question: any objections or issues with those ? > >> >> >> >> > I am currently trying to port Karaf to Exam2 but so far > having > >> >> >> >> > problems > >> >> >> >> > fighting the build. > >> >> >> >> > So, once that is done, i will share & release the RC. > >> >> >> >> > Maybe someone from Karaf (Guillaume, Andreas) ? Can help out? > >> >> >> >> > Toni > >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> >> > general mailing list > >> >> >> >> > [email protected] > >> >> >> >> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> >> general mailing list > >> >> >> >> [email protected] > >> >> >> >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > -- > >> >> >> > Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > -- *Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com*
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
