Okay, i need to look deeper into Karaf anyway, not just for Exam2 alone. So expect stupid questions there. ;)
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, in fact, except for the features part, it's not that much more > :) But for integration-tests (pax-exam) it would be so much easier if > we could simply unzip/untar the karaf distribution and run the > integration tests against it. Since karaf itself is no OSGi engine > (but rather uses felix or equinox) I'm not so sure if anyone else > could benefit by this... > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Remember FrameworkFactory is OSGi Core (4.2) API, so that does not just > > benefit Pax Exam but .. practically anyone. > > But i don't really know what makes Karaf special yet. So far i though of > > Karaf always as: set of launchers & provisioning infrastructure. > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> @Toni: Mhm I think this should be possible. > >> @Karaf-Guys: How do you feel about implementing the FrameworkFactory > >> for Karaf and making Karaf itself an OSGi-Framework for pax-exam2? I > >> think a simple alternative solution could be to provide an > >> karaf-kick-starter which actually implements FrameworkFactory but > >> downloads the latest apache-karaf.zip/tar.gz, unpacks it and > >> kickstarts it? WDYT? > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Andreas > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Toni Menzel <[email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > I want to look at Karaf because for the Exam2 release we need to > >> >> > balance > >> >> > between dropped features from exam1 and real bugs. > >> >> > There are some things that have been dropped on purpose: > >> >> > - like the ability to wire @Configurations to @Test methods via a > >> >> > pattern > >> >> > matching. This may be useful for some cases.. but i haven't seen it > >> >> > in > >> >> > use > >> >> > anywhere. > >> >> > Some stuff i hope can wait until 2.1: > >> >> > - maven plugin -> i don't really like it in Exam2 because it limits > >> >> > you > >> >> > to > >> >> > only the PaxRunner container (now,you have more;) But i think > people > >> >> > use > >> >> > it. > >> >> > >> >> BTW, maybe it would be possible to use karaf itself as testcontainer > >> >> instead of e.g. felix or equinox? > >> >> > >> > Well thats a really good idea! > >> > The simpliest way would be if Karaf identifies itself as a OSGi > >> > Container > >> > (provides a FrameworkFactory). Then we can do it without a code > change. > >> > Otherwise i have to look into what Karaf actually makes "Karaf". > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > Toni > >> >> >> > -> deutsch ? ;) > >> >> >> hä? ;) > >> >> > At some point i thought you are also german speaking.. > >> >> > >> >> Was my Denglish that obvious? ;) I'm from Austria, so yes Deutsch :) > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Kind regards, > >> >> >> Andreas > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Toni Menzel < > [email protected]> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > Yes, i actually just started yesterday with build problems. > >> >> >> > Will push changes to https://github.com/tonit/karafonexam2 when > >> >> >> > things > >> >> >> > come > >> >> >> > up. > >> >> >> > Actually i was hoping for a not that long running build in order > >> >> >> > to > >> >> >> > just > >> >> >> > focus on the IT projects. > >> >> >> > ttyl, thanks! > >> >> >> > Toni > >> >> >> > -> deutsch ? ;) > >> >> >> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Andreas Pieber > >> >> >> > <[email protected]> > >> >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Hey Toni, > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> It would be much easier for me if you could push what you > already > >> >> >> >> have > >> >> >> >> changed at Karaf to e.g. github and I can start from there? > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Kind regards, > >> >> >> >> Andreas > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Toni Menzel > >> >> >> >> <[email protected]> > >> >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> >> > yep. But technically that should be optional. But base will > be > >> >> >> >> > released, > >> >> >> >> > too. > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Andreas Pieber > >> >> >> >> > <[email protected]> > >> >> >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> BTW, I've just seen that you also have to release the base > >> >> >> >> >> packages > >> >> >> >> >> in > >> >> >> >> >> order to get out pax-runner-1.7 :) > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> Kind regards, > >> >> >> >> >> Andreas > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Toni Menzel > >> >> >> >> >> <[email protected]> > >> >> >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> > Hi Guys, > >> >> >> >> >> > i need to make a couple of releases in order to kick out a > >> >> >> >> >> > RC > >> >> >> >> >> > for > >> >> >> >> >> > Pax > >> >> >> >> >> > Exam > >> >> >> >> >> > 2.0 > >> >> >> >> >> > The only direct dependency is Pax URL 1.2.6 and Pax Runner > >> >> >> >> >> > 1.7 > >> >> >> >> >> > (because > >> >> >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> >> >> > the new Aether stuff). > >> >> >> >> >> > So, those are the ones that will get a release, perhaps > >> >> >> >> >> > already > >> >> >> >> >> > today, > >> >> >> >> >> > but > >> >> >> >> >> > possibly tomorrow. > >> >> >> >> >> > Question: any objections or issues with those ? > >> >> >> >> >> > I am currently trying to port Karaf to Exam2 but so far > >> >> >> >> >> > having > >> >> >> >> >> > problems > >> >> >> >> >> > fighting the build. > >> >> >> >> >> > So, once that is done, i will share & release the RC. > >> >> >> >> >> > Maybe someone from Karaf (Guillaume, Andreas) ? Can help > >> >> >> >> >> > out? > >> >> >> >> >> > Toni > >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> >> >> > general mailing list > >> >> >> >> >> > [email protected] > >> >> >> >> >> > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> >> >> general mailing list > >> >> >> >> >> [email protected] > >> >> >> >> >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > -- > >> >> >> >> > Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > -- > >> >> >> > Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com > >> > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> general mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > > > > > -- > > Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > -- *Toni Menzel - http://www.okidokiteam.com*
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
