On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Harald Wellmann < [email protected]> wrote:
> Well, using the JUnit driver without provisioning JUnit does not > really make sense, and junitBundles() is also "magic" in the sense > that the user does not know which version of JUnit they'll get, so we > might as well add it by default. > >From that viewpoint: yes, does make sense. I just had the idea of Drivers being.. just about how you control Pax Exam - how you actually interact with it. Not what you do with the container. In changing options depending on drivers you complect the HOW and WHAT. But sure, this might be to far from the actual user mind of thinking. Just keep that in mind when adding this stuff ;) Thanks Sahoo for the suggestion! > > With the new configuration properties introduced in 2.4.0, the user > can disable and override all defaults and take full control. > > Best regards, > Harald > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > -- Toni Menzel Source <http://tonimenzel.com>
_______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
