Hello Achim,

Just letting you know I have migrated all my webapps over to the pax
web trunk (i.e. which includes
the fix) successfully. It is working great now. Thankyou!

The next thing I wanted to try out was the new Virtual Hosts feature.
I looked at the pax web examples
and the jetty documentation. For pax web, it appears like the only way
to do this is via a file (jetty-web.xml) in the war.
 Is this correct?

I ask because I was hoping to restrict access to third-party wars
(such as the activemq web war or the karaf console)
to specific virtual hosts (i.e. I don't want these on an external
facing port/IP). Is that something I can do without editing
these third-party wars and adding the jetty-web.xml file (if I have
to, I have to - just seeing if I am missing something here)?

thanks in advance,
Gareth

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Gareth Collins
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks very much!
>
> Gareth
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> Hi Gareth,
>>
>> I just took care of it.
>> I'm going to release a new version of Pax web ASAP, latest beginning of next
>> week :)
>>
>> regards, Achim
>>
>> Am 19.06.2012 19:18, schrieb Gareth Collins:
>>
>>> Hello Achim,
>>>
>>> Added:
>>>
>>> http://team.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-384
>>>
>>> I can have a go at fixing it next week (as it is somewhat a showstopper
>>> for me)
>>> when I get back home.
>>>
>>> thanks again,
>>> Gareth
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Gareth,
>>>>
>>>> could you open an issue for this, I think limiting this to just 2 *.xml
>>>> files is probably wrong.
>>>> This is probably more a thinking of the old times where the web.xml was
>>>> supposed to be a single file.
>>>> Opening this to include a jetty-web.xml is probably the cause for this.
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Achim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 16.06.2012 05:08, schrieb Gareth Collins:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> As I see that some new software has been updated recently (such as Pax
>>>>> Web 2.0.0 - thankyou!) I decided to go back
>>>>> and try to update my OSGi dependencies and streamline my environment
>>>>> (which is why I was interested in removing
>>>>> the start ordering dependency in pax confman).
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway one of the first things I am trying to do in my updated
>>>>> environment is to get the updated 5.6.0 activemq web console
>>>>> to play nicely with the updated Pax Web. I am getting an error from
>>>>> Pax Web and I am not sure what it means (this is with equinox 3.6.2
>>>>> with the bndtools launcher). Is this suggesting there is something
>>>>> wrong with the activemq web console war or is this suggesting
>>>>> something else? There are seven XML files in the activemq WEB-INF
>>>>> directory:
>>>>>
>>>>> 20:50:23,521 | DEBUG | Gogo shell |
>>>>> ..swissbox.extender.BundleWatcher[216] | []:[] | Found resources
>>>>> [bundleentry://11.fwk2060982148/WEB-INF/web.xml,
>>>>> bundleentry://11.fwk2060982148/WEB-INF/webconsole-default.xml,
>>>>> bundleentry://11.fwk2060982148/WEB-INF/webconsole-embedded.xml,
>>>>> bundleentry://11.fwk2060982148/WEB-INF/webconsole-invm.xml,
>>>>> bundleentry://11.fwk2060982148/WEB-INF/webconsole-jndi.xml,
>>>>> bundleentry://11.fwk2060982148/WEB-INF/webconsole-properties.xml,
>>>>> bundleentry://11.fwk2060982148/WEB-INF/webconsole-query.xml]
>>>>> 20:50:23,527 | INFO  | Executor: 1 |
>>>>> ..war.internal.WebXmlObserver[117] | []:[] | Using [activemqweb] as
>>>>> web application context name
>>>>> 20:50:23,527 | DEBUG | Framework Event Dispatcher |
>>>>> ..apache.activemq.activemq-web-console[?] | []:[] | BundleEvent
>>>>> STARTED
>>>>> 20:50:23,527 | ERROR | Executor: 1 |
>>>>> ..war.internal.WebXmlObserver[124] | []:[] | Number of xml's was not
>>>>> lesser than 3. Was: 7
>>>>> org.ops4j.lang.PreConditionException: Number of xml's was not lesser
>>>>> than 3. Was: 7
>>>>>        at
>>>>>
>>>>> org.ops4j.lang.PreConditionException.validateLesserThan(PreConditionException.java:155)[33:org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-extender-war:2.0.0]
>>>>>        at
>>>>>
>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.web.extender.war.internal.WebXmlObserver.addingEntries(WebXmlObserver.java:121)[33:org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-extender-war:2.0.0]
>>>>>        at
>>>>>
>>>>> org.ops4j.pax.swissbox.extender.BundleWatcher$3.run(BundleWatcher.java:224)[33:org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-extender-war:2.0.0]
>>>>>        at
>>>>>
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441)[:1.6.0_31]
>>>>>        at
>>>>>
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)[:1.6.0_31]
>>>>>        at
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)[:1.6.0_31]
>>>>>        at
>>>>>
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)[:1.6.0_31]
>>>>>        at
>>>>>
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:206)[:1.6.0_31]
>>>>>        at
>>>>>
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)[:1.6.0_31]
>>>>>        at
>>>>>
>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)[:1.6.0_31]
>>>>>        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)[:1.6.0_31]
>>>>> 20:50:23,528 | DEBUG | Executor: 1 |
>>>>> ..war.internal.WebEventDispatcher[130] | []:[] | Sending web event
>>>>> WebEvent [replay=false, type=5,
>>>>> bundle=org.apache.activemq.activemq-web-console_5.6.0 [11],
>>>>> extenderBundle=org.ops4j.pax.web.pax-web-extender-war_2.0.0 [33],
>>>>> cause=org.ops4j.lang.PreConditionException: Number of xml's was not
>>>>> lesser than 3. Was: 7, timestamp=1339807823528,
>>>>> contextPath=/activemqweb, collisionIds=null, httpService=null,
>>>>> httpContext=null] for bundle org.apache.activemq.activemq-web-console
>>>>> 20:50:23,531 | DEBUG | WebListenerExecutor: 2 |
>>>>> ..pax.web.pax-web-extender-war[?] | []:[] |
>>>>> org/osgi/service/web/FAILED
>>>>>
>>>>> If anyone could indicate what this error may mean (is there really a
>>>>> max xml file limit in this directory?), it would be much appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks in advance,
>>>>> Gareth
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> general mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> - Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>>>> - OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>>>>  Committer &
>>>> Project Lead
>>>> - OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
>>>> <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>
>>>> Committer & Project Lead
>>>> - Blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> general mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> general mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> - Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> - OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>  Committer &
>> Project Lead
>> - OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>
>> Committer & Project Lead
>> - Blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> general mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to