oh hell... you're right. Since my changes the CM is required now. By
simplifying the class I've overseen that the complex way it was done
in makes CM required... I try to find a workaround here. All in all I
don't consider it a good idea making CM required here.

Kind regards,
Andreas

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Achim Nierbeck
<bcanh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Harald,
>
> and another one,
> looks like the commit [1], did remove the "optional" configuration Admin
> helper class.
> I know this was the fix for quite some nasty race conditions with felix
> in Karaf, so it might be this
> is the reason it's not optional anymore.
>
> regards, Achim
>
> [1] -
> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.url/commit/cce28d72dcec0779691c10dc87e312c500d119a2
>
> Am 22.08.2012 23:33, schrieb Achim Nierbeck:
>> Hi Harald,
>>
>> maybe we just need to make sure the imports for cm are optional?
>>
>> Regards, Achim
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 22.08.2012 19:42, schrieb Harald Wellmann:
>>> Locally upgrading Pax URL from 1.4.0 to 1.4.2 breaks my Pax Exam builds.
>>>
>>> There is a new dependency on org.osgi.service.cm which was not
>>> required in 1.4.0.
>>>
>>> I've traced this down to http://team.ops4j.org/browse/PAXURL-187, but
>>> from the problem description and the commit comments, I don't really
>>> see why the Config Admin Service is involved at all or why it has to
>>> be introduced in a base class for _all_ URL handlers.
>>>
>>> Could someone please shed some light on this...?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Harald
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> general mailing list
>>> general@lists.ops4j.org
>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>
>
>
> --
> -----
>
> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>  Committer & 
> Project Lead
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> general@lists.ops4j.org
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@lists.ops4j.org
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to