OK, just pushed a fix I've tested with Karaf and Exam... Now this one should be fixed for once and all! (hopefully :-))
Kind regards, Andreas On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: > hey harald, > > I've started with some experiments. Do you have an easy way for me to > test if those fix the problems? Would it be sufficient running the > exam 3 itests with the latest pax-url version? > > Thx and kind regards, > Andreas > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: >> all of them :-) The problem was that the previous code constructed a >> race condition in felix 4 leading to an absolute block of pax-url in >> some situtation (e.g. during installing some features in Karaf). >> >> It's next on my todo list, so this should follow today >> >> Kind regards, >> Andreas >> >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Harald Wellmann >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 2012/8/23 Andreas Pieber <[email protected]>: >>>> All in all I >>>> don't consider it a good idea making CM required here. >>> >>> Yes, would be better if you could make it optional or find a >>> completely different solution... >>> >>> Just for curiosity's sake: Which particular protocal handler are you >>> trying to configure, and what is the use case for this configuration? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Harald >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> general mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
