Hi Gareth,

you're probably right the export is missing, mind creating an issue for it :)

About the backport, hmm this is a change worth for a minor upgrade and one
of the reasons it's in the 3.0 line of Pax-Web. I have to think about
it a bit more :)

regards, Achim

2012/9/9 Gareth Collins <[email protected]>:
> Hello Achim,
>
> If I understand the pom correctly (I don't use maven - I guess the
> bundles are combined via the Embed-Dependency directive?), it may be
> just that the org.ops4j.pax.web.utils export is missing from the
> pax-web-jetty-bundle project. I only see the following
> org.ops4j.pax.web exports defined:
>
>               org.ops4j.pax.web.service; version="${project.version}",
>               org.ops4j.pax.web.service.spi; version="${project.version}",
>               org.ops4j.pax.web.service.spi.model; 
> version="${project.version}",
>               org.ops4j.pax.web.service.spi.util; version="${project.version}"
>
> If PAXWEB-417 is fixed by PAXWEB-367, that would be great! I will give
> it a try. I will probably be interested in backporting this fix
> (hopefully this wasn't fixed by a major architectural change).
>
> thanks again,
> Gareth
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> Hi Gareth,
>>
>> well the bundle should be included in the jetty-bundle.
>> A first glance didn't show anything missing.
>> Could you check what's really is missing?
>>
>> regarding PAXWEB-417, this should be handled with PAXWEB-367 on trunk (3.0).
>>
>> regards, Achim
>>
>>
>> 2012/9/5 Gareth Collins <[email protected]>:
>>> Hello Achim,
>>>
>>> Previously (pre-2.1 official) I could start up pax-web with just four 
>>> bundles:
>>>
>>> pax-web-extender-war
>>> pax-web-extender-whiteboard
>>> pax-web-jetty-bundle
>>> pax-web-jsp
>>>
>>> Now it appears that a fifth is required:
>>>
>>> pax-web-api -> to get org.ops4j.pax.web.utils (required by the jsp and
>>> extender-war).
>>>
>>> Do you know if that an intentional change (e.g. it shouldn't get
>>> bundled up with the "jetty-bundle, should it)?
>>> Just making sure as the Pax Web 2.1.0 release notes don't provide a
>>> link to this bundle in "Download distribution".
>>>
>>> BTW - I opened up a new defect:
>>>
>>> http://team.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-417
>>>
>>> I can see what's wrong...but it is not obvious (at least to me) how to 
>>> solve it.
>>>
>>> thanks in advance,
>>> Gareth
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> general mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>> Committer & Project Lead
>> OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
>> <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project
>> Lead
>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> general mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
> _______________________________________________
> general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general



-- 

Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
Committer & Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
<http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project
Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>

_______________________________________________
general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to