My apologies for the delay. I added the new defect. Here is the pointer: http://team.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-423
thanks again, Gareth On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Gareth, > > you're probably right the export is missing, mind creating an issue for it :) > > About the backport, hmm this is a change worth for a minor upgrade and one > of the reasons it's in the 3.0 line of Pax-Web. I have to think about > it a bit more :) > > regards, Achim > > 2012/9/9 Gareth Collins <[email protected]>: >> Hello Achim, >> >> If I understand the pom correctly (I don't use maven - I guess the >> bundles are combined via the Embed-Dependency directive?), it may be >> just that the org.ops4j.pax.web.utils export is missing from the >> pax-web-jetty-bundle project. I only see the following >> org.ops4j.pax.web exports defined: >> >> org.ops4j.pax.web.service; version="${project.version}", >> org.ops4j.pax.web.service.spi; version="${project.version}", >> org.ops4j.pax.web.service.spi.model; >> version="${project.version}", >> org.ops4j.pax.web.service.spi.util; >> version="${project.version}" >> >> If PAXWEB-417 is fixed by PAXWEB-367, that would be great! I will give >> it a try. I will probably be interested in backporting this fix >> (hopefully this wasn't fixed by a major architectural change). >> >> thanks again, >> Gareth >> >> >> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Achim Nierbeck <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi Gareth, >>> >>> well the bundle should be included in the jetty-bundle. >>> A first glance didn't show anything missing. >>> Could you check what's really is missing? >>> >>> regarding PAXWEB-417, this should be handled with PAXWEB-367 on trunk (3.0). >>> >>> regards, Achim >>> >>> >>> 2012/9/5 Gareth Collins <[email protected]>: >>>> Hello Achim, >>>> >>>> Previously (pre-2.1 official) I could start up pax-web with just four >>>> bundles: >>>> >>>> pax-web-extender-war >>>> pax-web-extender-whiteboard >>>> pax-web-jetty-bundle >>>> pax-web-jsp >>>> >>>> Now it appears that a fifth is required: >>>> >>>> pax-web-api -> to get org.ops4j.pax.web.utils (required by the jsp and >>>> extender-war). >>>> >>>> Do you know if that an intentional change (e.g. it shouldn't get >>>> bundled up with the "jetty-bundle, should it)? >>>> Just making sure as the Pax Web 2.1.0 release notes don't provide a >>>> link to this bundle in "Download distribution". >>>> >>>> BTW - I opened up a new defect: >>>> >>>> http://team.ops4j.org/browse/PAXWEB-417 >>>> >>>> I can see what's wrong...but it is not obvious (at least to me) how to >>>> solve it. >>>> >>>> thanks in advance, >>>> Gareth >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> general mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>> Committer & Project Lead >>> OPS4J Pax for Vaadin >>> <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project >>> Lead >>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> general mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> _______________________________________________ >> general mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > -- > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> > Committer & Project Lead > OPS4J Pax for Vaadin > <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project > Lead > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > general mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general _______________________________________________ general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/general
