On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Arjan van de Ven <ar...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On 10/5/2012 9:11 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote: >> As far as I know, Kibum Kim is away and he is just a SCM guy. > > SCM guy ?
Yes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_Control_Management He just dumped Tizen source code from Samsung internal git to public Tizen git. You know Tizen is largely based on Samsung Linux Platform. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tizen > >> At that time, Tizen didn't keep the internal git histories which is a bad >> idea. > > at that time? This is in August! > And yes, Tizen HAD a git already at that time.... this was not the first > commit at all. > Explained above. > >> >> So I recommend you to check debian/control or debian/changelog files. > >> I am not going to mention the maintainer's name here though. > (that's ok, I can do that... adding the right person to the CC as well now) > Thanks :) >> https://review.tizen.org/git/?p=external/bootchart.git;a=blob;f=debian/control;h=ac2733e90892c42280c31e2c1ae9513f42f55822;hb=30267f1d1bd18383ad0fa45d21fa00a2ed23cda9 >> https://review.tizen.org/git/?p=external/bootchart.git;a=blob;f=debian/changelog;h=b7762ace8a6e14819f0a4bebcdab2e09cc6342b2;hb=30267f1d1bd18383ad0fa45d21fa00a2ed23cda9 > > which have a last change entry of 2010. > This change was done in August 2012. > So these are not very useful files. > (adding debian files in the commit made sense as part of the general RPM -> > Debian transition that seems to be happening though) No Tizen is moving from deb to rpm and SBS to OBS. Tizen 1.0 : deb + SBS Tizen 2.0 : rpm + OBS https://wiki.tizen.org/wiki/OSDev/GBS debian directory is a legacy from Samsung internal code. But you can get some ideas who manages the package. Thanks. Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) > > In what architecture forum was the decision made to switch from the modern > (C) bootchart to the old (java) bootchart? > Were there Intel folks, or any non-Samsung folks present in that forum? > What were the reasons for changing away from the modern bootchart? > Is Tizen going include Java to work with this? > > this change really really smells fishy the more one looks at it... I hope the > explanation for it is actually > sensible and forthcoming ;-) > > > > >> >> Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) >> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Arjan van de Ven <ar...@linux.intel.com> >> wrote: >>> On 10/4/2012 10:56 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> in the following commit, from August 23rd, you seem to be replacing the >>>> very nice, modern and lightweight >>>> "bootchart" tool that is written by Auke in C, with a really old (2005!) >>>> version written in Java (!!) >>>> https://review.tizen.org/git/?p=external/bootchart.git;a=commitdiff;h=30267f1d1bd18383ad0fa45d21fa00a2ed23cda9 >>>> >>>> The commit message was less than useful, so I wonder if you would mind >>>> explaining the rationale >>>> for this change, which, to a casual observer like me, looks like a huge >>>> step backwards. >>>> I'm sure you had a good reason, and as someone who's building a different >>>> OS, this leaves me wondering, >>>> especially since so far, I've really liked Auke's bootchart tool. >>>> >>> >>> [no response yet] >>> >>> I've just tried to find this commit in the Gerrit instance on tizen.org, to >>> see if maybe there is a person >>> who approved this change I can ask the question to (Kim Kibum might be on >>> vacation and thus not responding). >>> However, for some reason Gerrit seems to have no record of this change. >>> >>> Is Tizen actually using Gerrit or is that just a pretense????? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> General mailing list >>> General@lists.tizen.org >>> https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general > _______________________________________________ General mailing list General@lists.tizen.org https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/general
