I have given infra the requirements. We're waiting for them to set it up. Regards, Ivan
On 23 May 2012 17:57, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > Ivan, > > Were you able to get a test site to work yet? > > Ralph > > On May 22, 2012, at 5:52 AM, Ivan Habunek wrote: > > Yeah, sorry I haven't been more involved in the discussion. I've been to > the phpday conference in Verona, and haven't had time to catch up. > > I posted a comment to the INFRA ticket with the required information. I'll > keep in the loop from now on to answer any other questions. > > Regards, > Ivan > > > On 22 May 2012 13:40, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ivan, >> >> Daniel has updated the Jira and asked "Can you provide a list of >> dependencies of your site's build process? (as port names -- see >> www.freshports.org -- for those deps that are in ports)" >> >> Since you have actually built the test site could you possibly help with >> this? The issue is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4699. >> >> Ralph >> >> On May 2, 2012, at 2:11 AM, Ivan Habunek <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I was away for a bit so I didn't comment earlier. >> >> My idea is to generate the site using Twig [1], a nice PHP templating >> engine, in combination with Textile markup [2], which is much more >> versatile than most other common markup languages (such as markdown, apt, >> ...). >> >> I have already converted the logging web site. The code can be found here: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/site/branches/experimental-twig-textile/ >> >> And I have deployed the generated web for demo here: >> http://bezdomni.net/logging/ >> >> This idea is obviously not compatible with the Apache CMS solution. >> Frankly, I would prefer this solution to the CMS since, from what I have >> seen, the CMS is quite a pain to use. >> >> Regards, >> Ivan >> >> [1] http://twig.sensiolabs.org/ >> [2] http://textile.sitemonks.com/ >> >> >> On 2 May 2012 10:44, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > On Apr 20, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > What i thought was, why not to clean it up? Your proposed solutions >>> > seem to be the cleanest way and updating everything just when we need >>> > an update to the main site feels somehow wrong >>> > >>> > >>> > Joe has now proposed using the CMS for the main Logging web site along >>> > with expaths.txt + svnpubsub for each sub-project. Each sub-project >>> would >>> > then use svn externals so they could be independently managed. This >>> sounds >>> > perfect to me. >>> >>> OK I understand svn externals is like "symlinks for svn". Sounds ok. >>> >>> I am a bit concerned on the CMS. Ivan has put much effort in the website >>> design: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/site/branches/experimental-redesign/src/site/pages/ >>> >>> I will ask infra (on the ticket) if it is possible to either use that >>> design for the CMS or if we can bypass the CMS feature for this one >>> too... >>> >>> Cheers >>> Christian >>> >>> >>> > Ralph >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://www.grobmeier.de >>> https://www.timeandbill.de >>> >> >> > >
