At 06:05 PM 5/2/2006 -0700, Mikeal Rogers wrote:
If we use the apache 2.0 license, which is incompatible with the GPL, wouldn't we then be restricting parcel developers from using the GPL if they did wish to do so?
Why would Chandler's (non-viral) license stop anyone from licensing their parcel under whatever license they want? (Including a closed-source commercial license, if they so choose.)
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
