"Theodore W. Leung" wrote:
>
> I've only gotten started looking at DocBook, and it seems like
> there are more tags than one knows what to do with. Is it really
> the case that there is no mapping of the current stylebook gramars onto
> some set of the docbook elements?
>
> I'm not sure if simplified docbook is enough, but perhaps we can use
> docbook and have the stylesheets only work for some of the elements?
>
> Just throwing out ideas
BTW, Cocoon and Avalon use Cocoon to generate their sites. There
is a Stylebook2Docbook.xsl file, as well as DocBook2fo.xsl and
DocBook2xhtml.xsl
The hard work has been done for you!
>
> Ted
>
> On Mon, 2001-10-29 at 23:52, Andy Clark wrote:
> > Edwin Goei wrote:
> > > + simplified docbook = may not be familiar to most
> >
> > Simplified DocBook would be my choice for markup up textual
> > information. However, there are other XML grammars in use now
> > (and in the future) for various parts of the documentation.
> > Things like release information, FAQs, APIs, settings, etc.
> > exhibit their own grammar structures to which neither
> > DocBook nor XHTML is suited.
> >
> > --
> > Andy Clark * IBM, TRL - Japan * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"Those who would trade liberty for
temporary security deserve neither"
- Benjamin Franklin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
