My preference would be that we have a single brand. Apache. At the moment organizational structure of the foundation is reflected in the dns's and the project names. I think it would be better to separate these two issues.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:45 AM Subject: Re: The organization of xml.apache.org > > > > Not to pollute the discussion too much, but I just recently became a > > part of one xml.apache.org project, and have been a member of the > > Apache community only about 6 months. Before I got involved, though, > > I was using both Jakarta and xml.apache.org software for quite a > > while. To me the xml.apache.org brand was always a "subsidiary brand" > > of ASF, as was Jakarta. It carries enough weight that I have looked > > here first when I need a piece of software for a project, and will try > > an Apache project out before a random Sourceforge one every time. > > > Where I work, Apache is a web server. Jakarta IS Java (or alternatively > its where you get struts and tomcat). XML.apache.org is where Xerces is > hidden. > > -Andy > > > > > $0.02 > > -- > > Ryan Hoegg > > ISIS Networks > > http://www.isisnetworks.net > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
