Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:

They are. Things done by entities entiteled by the Apache board are doing it in the name of Apache. PMCs are. Simple committers aren't.
Thus Apache will protect entities that it has officially and legally appointed.

But the existence of PMCs is not in this debate, nor if the current legal structure of Apache. If you have questions or suggestions please post them on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ted started a discussion which I now colloquially summarize into 'has the XML PMC been doing a good job lately?'. Jeff seeks clarification as to what PMCs are _required_ to do, tangentially stating the thought whether they are ultimately needed, in order to be able to comment on the original question.

I don't see the point in trying to police this thread's content, as long as we discuss as civil beings.

</Steven>
--
Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at http://radio.weblogs.com/0103539/
stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to