Vincent, On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 11:55 +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Vincent, > > I'm really not open for this discussion. Technically, it could be done > as you propose. Historically and following best practices, what we do is > state of the art in Subversion. See also: > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn.branchmerge.commonuses.html#svn.branchmerge.commonuses.patterns > > In a nutshell: Work is done on trunk and branches, a "tag" is NEVER > modified once it is created. A "tag" is used as an easy pointer to the > revision that was used to create a release. > > The drawback you're mentioning is exactly the reason why I don't want to > change our patterns. But this is a democracy. Let's see....
As I am a big fan of standard practices I'd prefer the practice described in the svn book (apparently the current practice), so -1 to changing the process. mfG Max Berger e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- OpenPG ID: E81592BC Print: F489F8759D4132923EC4 BC7E072AB73AE81592BC For information about me and my work please see http://max.berger.name
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
