Hello Vincent,
The most recent human assembly on our browser is based on the NCBI Build
36.1. Thus the data for our assembly track came from NCBI and they made
the decisions about which BAC sequence were included. You will have to
consult NCBI regarding the criteria for BAC sequence inclusion. You may
also want to consult this page describing assembly creation here:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/assembly/index.shtml
Our track, BAC Ends, is an attempt to filter BACs based on quality (we
only includes those pairs meeting certain criteria, as described in the
track description). To see the track description click on the blue/gray
bar to the left of the track in the main display or on the track title
above the pulldown menu. BACs that were excluded can be viewed on our
test site in the "Incorrect BAC End Pairs" track:
www.genome-test.cse.ucsc.edu
Note that the data/tracks on this site have not been tested.
Hopefully this information was helpful and answers your question. If you
have further questions or require clarification feel free to contact the
mailing list at [email protected].
Best regards,
Pauline Fujita
UCSC Genome Bioinformatics Group
http://genome.ucsc.edu
Vincent Meyer wrote:
> Dear UCSC team,
>
> We are currently trying to retrieve BAC sequences which are not included
> in the Human "Golden Path".
> For this purpose, we use the data of the "Assembly" track and subtract
> the BAC of this listing from a "full" RP11 listing.
> By this procedure, can we assume that the BAC selected are really not
> included in the goldenpath?
> Could you give us some informations about the reasons which lead to
> these BAC discarding?
>
> Thanks you
>
> Best regards
>
>
> Vincent MEYER
> _______________________________________________
> Genome maillist - [email protected]
> http://www.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
>
_______________________________________________
Genome maillist - [email protected]
http://www.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
