Hello, James.

Thank you for your interest.  I believe this FAQ will be helpful:
http://genome.ucsc.edu/FAQ/FAQtracks.html#tracks1.  You may also want to
look at this previously-answered mailing list question:
https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/pipermail/genome/2005-July/008162.html.

I would also like to note that your observation that we are numbering gaps
rather than bases appears to be related to the representation of the
sequence at the top of the Browser display.  As you can see from the
screenshot you provided, there is a continuous gene at that location and
thus, no gaps to number.  The gaps you are referring to are merely gaps
between the letters that represent the sequence, but not gaps in the actual
sequence itself.  The numbering scheme in the Browser display is such that
when you see a number such as 43819085 next to a hash mark, the base
immediately to the left of that hash mark is base number 43819085.

Please contact us again at [email protected] if you have any further
questions.

---
Steve Heitner
UCSC Genome Bioinformatics Group

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of J Ireland
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 11:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Genome] base vs gap numbering

Hey cats!

I had a question regarding base vs gap numbering on the genome browser.  My
impression has been that the zero-based, half-open convention used at UCSC
was a base-numbered system.  However, when you zoom in on the browser, it
appears that it's the gaps that are being numbered (as in the attached
screenshot).

I've started collecting some thoughts on genome coordinate systems in this
draft blog post (
http://alternateallele.blogspot.com/2012/03/genome-coordinate-conventions.ht
ml),
and it got me thinking/wondering about this discrepancy in my assumption
about the conventions you're using vs what I see on the browser.

Could you set me straight?

Thanks!
 -J

_______________________________________________
Genome maillist  -  [email protected]
https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome

Reply via email to